Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jasmine Paolini vs Sandra Zaniewska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paolini vs Zaniewska analysis and find out who is favored!
Jasmine Paolini vs Sandra Zaniewska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paolini 0 - 0 Zaniewska
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paolini has won 47.17% of points on their second serve, while Zaniewska has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paolini, in recent form, has won 56.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zaniewska has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paolini has saved 53.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zaniewska has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paolini has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 46/ 26), with Zaniewska winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paolini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 207/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Zaniewska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 134/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Paolini has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Zaniewska has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paolini has played against opponents with an average rank of 128.11 while Zaniewska has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paolini has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zaniewska has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paolini has converted 53.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zaniewska has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
15
Rank
12
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
142
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
58% (373-267)
Career Total W/L
64% (224-124)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,388,226
Career Prize Money
$18,965
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jasmine Paolini | Sandra Zaniewska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (41/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (336/281) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.96 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1353/1953) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (842/1353) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (283/600) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (126/235) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (936/2013) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (18/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (16/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (16/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Hailey Baptiste
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Daria Saville
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
33 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
48%
(
54 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Jasmine Paolini
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Jasmine Paolini
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Sara Errani
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandra Zaniewska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Sandra Zaniewska
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Sandra Zaniewska
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Sandra Zaniewska
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
88%
(
83 of
94)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paolini Vs Zaniewska Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jasmine Paolini
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
